In the May issue of the Beacon Lights, our brother Mr. Fred Iwema, of our Bethel PRC, responded to my article entitled, “Child-bearing, Not Child Prevention” of the February issue. He indicates this is a “hot” issue and takes a stand against my view. He states his response “follows considerable meditation and prayer on his part” which I appreciate. Since this has also been true for myself, it may appear that either view may be acceptable after all. But can this be? Let us look a little deeper into this and seek to know what the will of God is for us with this “hot” issue.

Personally, the hatred of this world for large families is not a surprise to me because I come from a covenant family of ten sons and six daughters. Although we often heard many compliments for having such a nice family, there were also those who ridiculed us at times. But when our belief of God’s command to “be fruitful and to multiply” is questioned by members of the same household of faith we want to know for certain whether we are mistaken or if this biblical command is actually no longer in force. We must honestly face this matter in the light of God’s Word and then make our conclusions accordingly. May God give us the grace to do so in the spirit of Christian love for one another.

Our brother writes that this matter must be left up to each couple to decide for themselves and that the church, or anyone else, has no say in the matter. He wants to use the term “conception control” instead of “birth-control” or “child-prevention.” He made no reference to any passage of scripture for support of his position other than the passage of Genesis 38, which really does not support his view at all. He only mentions this passage is not relevant. However, both the position of “conception control” or “birth control” disregard the command of God in Genesis 1:28 and the instruction of God in Psalm 127. Therefore, my convictions on the issue of “birth-control,” “child-prevention” or “conception control” remain unchanged.

To avoid being overly lengthy in my response I will answer the questions he posed and then make a few summary remarks and conclusions.

Our brother asks the question, “Can the ‘tea- totaller’ judge the action of the moderate user?” My answer is yes but they must judge the actions of the moderate user accurately. If the moderate user is only a moderate user he may not be condemned. However, to place the issue of alcohol consumption on par with our calling as husband and wives to have covenant children does not apply to the issue at hand. You will not become drunk if you have what some call “too many” children!

In the same paragraph, our brother asks: “Would it not also be true then that those who claim to have a ‘headache’ or are ‘too tired’ for sexual union are also guilty of ‘conception control’? If so, is the church prepared, or even permitted, to ‘police the bedrooms’ of its parishioners?” My answer is that I Corinthians 7:5 teaches husbands and wives are not to defraud each other, except it be with consent for a time, to give themselves to fasting and prayer. If one claims to have a “headache,” or to be “too tired” for sexual union for selfish reasons that may well be defrauding one’s mate. My response to the brother’s question whether “the church is prepared, or even permitted, to ‘police the bedrooms’ of its parishioners” is yes—if it becomes apparent that sin is going on in the bedroom. Of course, we should not place policemen in bedrooms but the church must not be afraid to begin discipline when sin is brought to their attention. And when sin is kept secret, we ought to remember that our Lord’s all-searching eyes are everywhere present—even in our bedrooms. Perhaps we do not take this as seriously as we ought to.

In a following paragraph, the brother states, “Genesis 38 is not a condemnation of ‘conception control’ just as Leviticus 10 is not a condemnation of burning incense. Onan broke the command to fulfill the Leverite law, Nadab and Abihu broke the command to come to worship according the instruction of God.” My reply here is that his reference to Onan, as simply breaking the Levitical law, misses the point since the very act of Onan was to prevent having seed (vs. 9), that is a child, from being raised up to carry on the name of his brother. Of Onan’s act, we read: “And the thing which he did displeased the Lord: wherefore he slew him also.” (vs. 10) Even though it was likely that Onan’s root sin was hatred, his wicked deed was an act of “conception control” or “prevention.” In this regard one should read chapter 38 of Rev. Harbach’s book, Studies in the Book of Genesis. It has excellent instruction for all of us on this subject. (See pgs. 718-719 re Onan’s sin.) Also, the passage in Deut. 25: 5-10 shows an alternate way that Onan could have taken. This alternate means was actually used in Ruth 4:6-10 and the kinsman was not killed!

Concerning the statement of my former article, “In my younger days, if someone would have promoted birth control they would have been strongly warned that this was a form of murder,” the brother asks and states the following: “Is then Mr. DeJong saying that we commit murder if we use ‘conception control’? Would that not suggest that we had thwarted the sovereign purpose of God to bring forth a specific child? Can we do that? Of course not! It denies sovereignty, and suggests that God is not able to bring forth each of those for whom He planned before the foundation of the world.” My response to the first question is that preventing the life of a child from being born is essentially destroying the life of a child before it even begins to develop. There is life in the sperm and modern technology bears this out as well. In very rare cases, if it can be proved that conception will result in the death of the mother, an exception to such a rule may apply. But one ought to be convinced that this is really the case. (This is similar to one’s duty to shoot and kill the enemy in war at the general’s command. Such is not considered as murder.)

The other question whether “conception control” can “thwart the sovereign purpose of God to bring forth a specific child,” is a misuse of the great truth of the sovereignty of God. It uses the truth of God’s sovereignty to justify doing one’s own will. It is certainly true that our actions will never alter the sovereign, decretive will of God. But that does not allow us to do things contrary to God’s will of command (His preceptive will), and say this will never alter God’s sovereign (decretive) will. That, would be like the true “Hyper-Calvinist.” All our actions must be done in harmony with the commandments of God’s Word. I do not know whether the brother actually intends this, but we must not allow such a conception of the sovereignty of God to justify our deeds.

In reality, none of us can ever determine how many children God will give us. All we can do is seek to prevent or abort but we sinful humans can not create life. God alone makes some barren and others fruitful. To “control conception,” “space children” (which naturally eliminates a child—or else what would fill in the space?) or to practice “birth control” are both attempts to do away with a child. Otherwise preventative actions would not even be needed to begin with!

Much more could be said. May what has been said be seen, not simply as a fight between brethren of the church, but as a search for the truth of God’s Word in this matter. May our covenant young people take their calling to seek godly mates to love and cherish in the marriage state seriously. Also, may God give them the courage and strength to raise up all the children that God may be pleased to give them. Then God’s command for us to be fruitful and multiply on the earth will be done. Our quivers will be full according to His will, as commanded for us to obey in His Word. May the arrows He gives not simply stay in our quivers but be shot forward into new generations. Generations which, by the grace of God, continue to give birth to all the covenant children of God until the last elect child is born and our Lord returns upon the clouds of glory.

Let us pray for wisdom and grace, especially for our mothers in Israel, not only to bear all the children God is pleased to give us, but also to raise them up in the fear and admonition of His name. We must not adopt the practice of the world, which not only prevents conception, but also aborts millions of children.

In The Bible and Birth Control, by Charles D. Provan, we read, “… Some theologians spoke out against the limiting of children by Christians until fairly recent times. And now, opposition to birth control is almost dead. We hope this paper will help to rekindle it, and lead to God bestowing many blessings upon his people: wonderful children.” That is also my desire. Buy the book and read it. You won’t be sorry!




Ken De Jong

Member of Peace PRC

When our December issues of the Beacon Lights came in the mail, I handed a copy to one of my sons. A little later, he asked if I agreed with the second to last paragraph of “Augustine on Sex and Marriage” by Mr. Spencer, found on pages 21 & 22. After reading it, I explained to him that we agreed with the thrust of the article which brings out how our sexual relations in marriage can and should glorify God, both in the way of bringing forth children and in the intimate oneness a husband and wife enjoy. Scriptures teach that our marriages should reflect the mysterious bond of Christ and His bride, the church. However, I explained to my son that we do not agree with the idea of birth control, as seemed to be implied in the article.

My main concern, therefore, is with what the author left unsaid about the use of birth control. It is not my intent to attack the views of the writer. It is my view that using birth control is wrong, except perhaps in “extreme” cases. We should not allow ourselves to be conned into thinking we can enjoy the pleasures of the sexual relationship in marriage, a wonderful gift of God, and at the same time avoid the normal responsibilities connected with that. After all, who really ever thinks they have enough time or finances for raising children? What guideline will determine when there is enough time or money for the needs of the family? Because of our sinful natures, we can quickly think up all kinds of excuses, but where in God’s Word is birth control ever supported?

After Adam and Eve sinned, did not God tell Eve He would multiply her sorrow and conception? And are we now going to ease the sorrow through use of birth control? In my younger days, if someone would have promoted birth control they would have been strongly warned that this was a form of murder. This may seem extreme today, but when considered from the point of view that a person’s life is being prevented we can better understand the reasoning. Such thinking can very easily lead to justification for abortions. Do we have God’s approval to prevent or to take life? God controls all things, including the marvel of conception in a mother’s womb, and should we tamper with this?

Many related questions come up in this connection. Do we read in the Bible anywhere that God suggests married couples may decide when or how many children they want? Do we really believe the Scriptures that a woman shall be saved in child-bearing (I Tim. 2:15), which also includes all the sorrows that go along with it? Are we becoming so educated we reason things to our own advantage? Today’s modern world, which is headed for final destruction, emphasizes the need for birth control. Are we slowly becoming immune to our calling to bear the children God may be pleased to give us?

My wife and I struggled whether we may have had a legitimate reason to use birth control. A doctor had told us we should not have any more children. He claimed that the way he had to do the cesarean section, should my wife become pregnant, would lead to her death. In fact, he informed us he would not do another maternity case for us. We sought advice from other doctors, and our Christian friends, and finally decided there was not enough evidence to support our doctor’s contention. Therefore, rather than practicing birth control, we left the matter in God’s hands. Later, the Lord saw fit to give us another child, an adorable little girl, to raise with the sorrows spoken of in His Word, but also with the joys that are in Christ. If we had practiced birth control, this child would have been prevented. Christ said, “Suffer the little children to come unto me, and forbid them not.” (Mark 10:14) Why did he say this? Was it not because he loved them and would give His life for them, too?

During that time, friends and ministers gave varying views, but ultimately our decision was based on our understanding of Scripture’s teaching that children are not our own but very really gifts from God (Ps. 127:2). Therefore, after seriously questioning whether we had one of those “extreme” cases, we came to the conclusion we did not and did not take such an important matter into our own hands. If the pregnancy would have resulted in the death of the mother, we would leave it in the hands of Him who gives life and takes life. (So, perhaps there really are no “extreme” cases.) I am very thankful for the oneness that my wife and I had through this trial. At times my wife shed some tears, but her life testified of a deep love for God and evidenced godly submission to His ways, knowing He does all things righteously.

We realize there are many difficulties and sacrifices involved in having and raising many children. For this reason, it is important that all of us appreciate all the effort and energy our wives and mothers exert in the bearing and nurturing of our covenant children in the fear of God.

May God use these thoughts as a warning for us to be faithful to Him in our calling to bring forth the covenant seed. (Gen. 1:28, 9:1, Psalm 127:3-5) ❖

The Christian is placed in many different circumstances while on this earth. Some are characterized by hardships and trials, and others are full of joy and peace. How should the Christian respond? Throughout the Bible there are numerous times where God’s people sang in response to their various circumstances. Singing in response to God’s ordering […]

Continue reading

The book of Proverbs was written by King Solomon to his young adult son. Solomon’s purpose in writing Proverbs was “that the generation to come might know them [God’s wonderful works]…that they might set their hope in God, and not forget the works of God, but keep his commandments” (Ps. 78:6–7). Throughout the book, Solomon […]

Continue reading

The group of churches that John writes to in this trio of epistles had recently experienced a split because of doctrinal controversy. We do not know the exact content of the error that these false teachers were spreading, but it is apparent from John’s writing that their teaching somehow denied the truth of the incarnation—that […]

Continue reading

Jael: An Example of Christian Warfare

This article was originally presented as a speech at a Protestant Reformed mini convention held at Quaker Haven Camp in August 2021. Jael lived during the era of the judges. Deborah the prophetess was the judge who served Israel at the time of Jael. During this time, the Canaanites under the rule of king Jabin […]

Continue reading

Indiana Mini Convention Review 2021

One of this year’s “mini conventions” was hosted by Grace and Grandville Protestant Reformed Churches at Quaker Haven Camp. Located just over two hours away in northern Indiana, the camp was a perfect fit for the 120 kids and 15 chaperones who attended. A total of twelve different churches were represented: Byron Center, Faith, First […]

Continue reading

Editorial, November 2021: Catechism Season

At the point that this edition of Beacon Lights arrives in the homes of our subscribers, most young people in the Protestant Reformed Churches will have been sitting under the catechism instruction of their pastor or elders for more than a month. If our readers are honest, that observation probably comes with a (quiet) sigh […]

Continue reading

Tennessee Young People’s Retreat 2021

The 2021 Tennessee young people’s retreat was held August 9 to 13 by Providence, Hudsonville, Unity, and First (Holland) Protestant Reformed Churches. The retreat took place at Eagle Rock Retreat Center in the city of Tallassee. It was about an eleven-hour drive, give or take a bit due to stops for food and restrooms. Though […]

Continue reading